upArrow
Homes
upArrow
Video
upArrow
Cars
upArrow
Ads
upArrow
Jobs
Home   »  Local News

Bookmark and Share

Save This Article Email This Article  

USD students: Hyperion is not sustainable

By David Lias david.lias@plaintalk.net
Published: Friday, December 11th, 2009


The proposed Hyperion oil refinery proposed to be constructed not far from Vermillion in Union County is not a sustainable project.

That is the conclusion of University of South Dakota students who addressed the Vermillion City Council at its noon meeting Monday.

The University of South Dakota IDEA 410 class: Wall Street & Ethics – Do Social Justice, Community, and Sustainability Cost Too Much, researched various aspects of the Hyperion project. The study addresses issues surrounding oil, energy, water, health, and the environment to determine whether the proposed project is, or is not, sustainable in the long run.

This research was performed in teams, each focusing on and applying a different criterion from Jared Diamond’s book Collapse. Diamond believes that societies can be determined to be sustainable, or not, by applying five criteria to specific circumstances. These criteria are: environmental damage, climate change, loss of friendly contacts, rise of hostile contacts, and political, economic, social and cultural setting.

The students told aldermen that only the final criteria – political, economic, social and cultural setting –  could be deemed sustainable.

The students noted that the Hyperion project would use 9 to 12 million gallons of water and day in the refining process. They also cited information credited to Derrick Iles, state geologist for the South Dakota Department of Natural Resources, who has stated that the biggest concern is not the consumption of groundwater but possible pollution.

The students also concluded that pollution from the refinery would likely have detrimental effects on nearby land because of contamination.

Hyperion has proposed to have nearly no external emissions because of internal combustion chambers.  Although Hyperion has made these claims on their Web site, they are still unable to meet the standards of the proposed state air permit, the students told aldermen Monday, adding that Hyperion claims the refinery will produce roughly one third of the emissions of the Flint Hill refinery in Minnesota, while producing around 40 percent more oil per day, but still not meet state and federal pollution standards.

    The students noted that corn production is a predominant economic activity in Union County and the surrounding area, and the Hyperion refinery could have a significant negative effect on corn growth. The risks of gaining another oil refinery in the United States, and more importantly in Union County, may outweigh the benefit, the students concluded through their research, noting that the environmentally responsible decision pertaining to land around Hyperion would be to continue with existing practices instead of endangering them with heavy industry.

The university students told the city council that the proposed Hyperion project has the potential to change the air quality of the immediate area as well as distant areas within the wind patterns surrounding Union County. It is estimated that the refinery will emit 19.6 million tons of pollutants annually. The USD students noted in their presentation that some individuals, including Gov. Mike Rounds, argue the emissions from this plant will only be 32 percent of what is currently emitted from Sioux Falls.

The class members' research notes that some Hyperion representatives and people in support of the refinery have claimed that due to the great air quality that currently exists in that region, most pollutants emitted from the proposed site will disappear into the atmosphere over time.

Research has shown that this is a misconception and that the pollutants being produced by a refinery will fall from the air and settle on the farmland around the region of Union County, according to the students' presentation. The USD class also presented research findings to the council that concludes that pollutants emitted by the refinery will continue to linger in the air for years.

Students learned that many people who live in the surrounding area of the proposed site and who are in favor of the refinery do not believe the proposed project will affect their day to day lives. However, the USD student's research concludes that emissions released into the air by the refinery will travel in the air by wind currents and have the potential to leave lasting effects on the farmland and quality of life of the in the area.

The student researchers concluded that the refinery would emit too much pollution into the atmosphere and the creates enough ecological issues in the Boreal Forests of Canada, where the oil that will be refined is contained in tar sands, to make it a worthwhile long term energy solution.

Students noted that if future technology would allow oil companies to harvest bitumen from the Boreal Forest in a less harmful manner, then the project could be sustainable for a longer period of time than currently projected.

One of the students involved in the research conducted a survey of individuals living in the area of the proposed refinery, and found that the community is equally for and against Hyperion, and that  some people are undecided.  Pollution is the major concern for members that are opposed and undecided about the issue, and growth is the major concern for supporters. 

The survey revealed that many people feel that Hyperion is not telling the truth about pollution rates, however, those supporting the project think that the plant will be green and have almost no change to the air quality.  When survey participants were asked what has to happen for them to change their stance, many of the members would change if there was too much pollution or alternative energy companies had interest in the location. Surprisingly, many people said they will not change their mind regardless of any changes.       

The people surveyed consisted on average of older men with income around $50,000 living both in rural and in-town Vermillion.  About 20 percent of members surveyed own or owned a business at one point in time.  Of the people surveyed, on average they felt they had above average knowledge about the Hyperion project.  



Click Here To See More Stories Like This

Current Comments

7 comments so far (post your own)
maurtura
December 11th, 2009 at 10:17am

great article. skeptics and those borderline on their decisions should read this. it will convince them this is a bad deal. is it possible to talk to the people that did this class project?

Diane Chamberlain
December 11th, 2009 at 23:06pm

Still in possession of my great-grandmother's farmland just east of Vermillion and watching this story from a distance, I am pleased to hear someone is considering the environmental impact in at least some slight detail. Although some of this impact may be measurable from past history, I do not feel comfortable that we truly understand the potential problems this project may create, environmental proglems that may prove irreversable. And, history shows that "clean-up" projects due to negative environmental impact are rarely funded sufficiently nor completed to the full extent necessary. When in doubt, go without.

indy
December 13th, 2009 at 07:54am

Wow! Great work on the part of these students. Thanks for publishing this article. People need to be informed!

La Rae Osei
December 13th, 2009 at 18:37pm

We moved from Vermillion to the Houston, TX metro area. There are many refineries and chemical plants in this surrounding region. We experience this pollution every day. It is wonderful to go back to South Dakota and breathe fresh, clean air! We smile to see dust on our vehicle instead of a grimy black film!
To the residents of Union County and the surrounding area: say "NO!" to Hyperion. I can not believe that anyone would seriously consider putting a refinery in this area. We all want economic growth, but at what price? We cannot exchange our health and environment for "economic growth."
And another thought -- just WHO will be pocketing all this money that Hyperion is supposed to bring into the community?
South Dakota, the future is in alternative sources of energy. Be a leader and move forwards, not backwards.

BigChiefOilBurner
December 14th, 2009 at 15:24pm

I saw the presentation and it was very well done for a bunch of 6 year olds whining about oil bad smoking weed good.
Seriosly though this was done by a bunch of kids that dont have a clue about the real world or what it is like to find a job.
When they graduate and need a job to pay off there student loans and cant find one they should look back on there "findings" and shut up.

Dave Wilson
December 16th, 2009 at 12:02pm

I too an glad someone is evaluating the environmental consequences of an oil refinery being located in South Dakota. None of our regulatory agencies have insisted on an Environmental Impact Statement. Are they looking after the best interests of SD citizens? Maybe they should be more concerned about the environmental consequences and not supporting the smokescreen of a "green" oil refinery and the supposed "economic value" of this kind of heavy industry locating in the state.

Dave Wilson
June 16th, 2010 at 13:23pm

Now Hyperion is questioning the thoroughness of its own air quality permit application. They have requested another review of the permit and an extension of the date to begin construction. Either the permit is flawed, or Hyperion needs a delay to get its financing and political support reorganized light of recent economic conditions and environmental disasters elsewhere.

Leave your comment:

Name:

Email:

Website:

Comments:


Enter the text as it is shown below:



Please enter text
This extra step helps prevent automated abuse of this feature. Please enter the characters exactly as you see them.
 

Note: Emails will not be visible or used in any way. Please keep comments relevant. Any content deemed inappropriate or offensive may be deleted.


Vermillion Plain Talk
201 W. Cherry Street - Vermillion, SD 57069 - Phone: (605) 624-4429, Fax: (605) 624-2696
©Copyright 2004-2010 Vermillion Plain Talk

All rights reserved. View the Vermillion Plain Talk's Privacy Policy. This material may not be broadcast, published, rewritten or redistributed without written permission.